Contact Us

Thursday, March 06, 2008

Notes from Meeting with Public Works Department to Discuss Local Road Projects

To begin, I'd like to extend a huge thank you to Dominic Chavez from Castlewood-Oak Valley. He has been organizing area residents to work with the City of Austin to come to a consensus around which of various city-proposed road projects would be most beneficial to our area.

The latest of his efforts was to broker a meeting between neighborhood leaders and staff from the Public Works Department, which just concluded. I here attempt to report the facts of the situation as explained by the various attendees:
  1. Coming into the meeting, there was broad agreement that projects to realign Deer Ln west of Brodie with Davis Ln east of Brodie as well as to close the gap in Davis Ln between Huebinger Pass and Leo St. should proceed as planned.
    • The project for closing the gap between Huebinger and Leo is approximately 80% through the design process, but still requires land acquisition which usually takes about 1 year
    • The project to realing Davis with Deer is not scheduled to complete design until October of 2009 and also requires land acquisition, which could proceed while design is ongoing
  2. The two big open issues were what to do with Westgate (complete the missing section, not complete the missing section, or something somewhere in-between) and what kinds of improvements could be made to Davis Ln east of Brodie
  3. City staff indicated that both Brodie Ln and Manchaca are operating at service level "B", meaning that they are supporting acceptable (by the City's standards) traffic flow
  4. City staff estimates indicated that a completed 4-lane Westgate Blvd would draw about 8700 trips per day. Long-range CAMPO (Capital Area Metropolitan Planning Organization) estimates are around 8900. For comparison, Brodie draws about 22,000, and a 2 lane Westgate would be expected to support approximately 10,000 trips per day at "acceptable" levels
  5. Previously, some residents had suggested compromise solutions to the Westgate extension that were intended to address the concerns of AISD with regard to Cowan elementary but without completing Westgate. City staff clearly indicated that they do not consider these options to be viable specifically because they do not create a contiguous Westgate, which the city's plan calls for.
  6. City staff also indicated that minor improvements to Davis Lane might be possible, but that widening it to 4 lanes is out of the question because CAMPO's plan only calls for it to be two lanes (between Brodie and Manchaca).
  7. A representative from DR Horton, which is developing some condominiums across Westgate from Cowan, south of Davis, indicated that they posted approximately $400,000 in fiscal warrants from improvements to Deer, but nothing for Davis.
  8. According to city staff, fiscal warrants from developers are rarely enough to fund whole projects since they only cover that development's impact to area traffic.
  9. City staff indicated that from a timing perspective, it was unlikely that the Westgate funding would be used for any new projects that have not already been funded. However, due to the nature of the construction process and a trend of increasing costs, the longer they wait to build the Westgate project, the more likely it is that the money will have been diverted to other (already funded) projects that may experience increased baseline costs or cost overruns and that at some point the Westgate extension becomes impossible.
  10. City staff indicated that a design for a 4 lane contiguous Westgate has now been 100% completed and that they are just waiting on area residents to make a decision
  11. City staff also indicated that redesigning Westgate as a 2 lane roadway would be possible and take about another 60 days. This was city staff's recommended option if residents didn't like the 4-lane Westgate
  12. City staff requested that residents give them an answer within 30 days (best case) or 60 days if that's not possible. They would like to go before the Urban Transportation Commission with a consensus, but will go before them without one if necessary. What they would recommend in that case was unclear. Dominic Chavez will be setting up a follow-up meeting for just the neighborhood leaders to discuss further and hopefully come to a conclusion

Labels: ,

1 Comments:

Blogger Phil Brown said...

First, thanks to those who attended the meeting. I'm curious -- was Tanglewood Oaks there? Were they invited? They have had a longstanding opposition to the Westgate extension and are the ones most affected by it locally.

Here are some quick responses to the information in Percy's excellent write-up:

* On Brodie and Manchaca supporting "acceptable" traffic flow: I'd like more detail from the city on what that means exactly on Brodie, and whether that is averaged out along most or all of Brodie's length or just our section of it. Brodie south of Slaughter is a parking lot, and from about William Cannon on to 290 is almost as bad.

* Why would a two-lane Westgate extension support 10,000 trips per day, but a four-lane extension would support less than 9,000? I don't follow that.

* Several comments in this report once again indicate an entrenched staff that is going to read the book to us. Example: The city's plan calls for a contiguous Westgate, therefore other options are not viable. We MUST fight that attitude. The transportation board last fall indicated there should be some flexibility and that perhaps funds could be diverted from Westgate to Davis to make it wider and safer east of Brodie. "Minor improvements" are NOT acceptable.

* As with the traffic light situation, we must be prepared to thank the staff for their time, then make this a political issue.

* Ref: "A representative from DR Horton, which is developing some condominiums across Westgate from Cowan, south of Deer, indicated that they posted approximately $400,000 in fiscal warrants from improvements to Deer, but nothing for Davis." -- I'm confused. The condos are south of Davis, not Deer, right? It's east of Brodie. When we met with DR Horton long ago, I'm pretty sure that the assumption was there would be improvements to Davis on the south side.

* Ref: "City staff indicated that from a timing perspective, it was unlikely that the Westgate funding would be used for any new projects that have not already been funded." -- Again, this is not in the spirit of what the transportation commission told us last fall. We need to engage that commission at whatever level we can to continue to ensure that our wishes are being heard. If the staff's hands are tied, we need to go over their heads.

* Ref: "City staff indicated that a design for a 4 lane contiguous Westgate has now been 100% completed and that they are just waiting on area residents to make a decision." -- And what if we decide we don't want it extended? The transportation commission made it very clear that money should not be diverted from our area just because we don't like the city's plans.

* Ref: "City staff requested that residents give them an answer within 30 days (best case) or 60 days if that's not possible. They would like to go before the Urban Transportation Commission with a consensus, but will go before them without one if necessary. What they would recommend in that case was unclear. Dominic Chavez will be setting up a follow-up meeting for just the neighborhood leaders to discuss further and hopefully come to a conclusion." -- This sounds ominous. I don't like the city staff setting deadlines.

Let's go back to the transportation commission ourselves.

Phil Brown
Cherry Creek on Brodie
Dev Comm

8:18 PM  

Post a Comment

<< Home